Exposed! :: Digital DecisionsChoosing film or digital workflow© Copyright 2006. All Rights Reserved. Contents
Many photographers, professional and amateur, are switching to digital formats of capturing images. It has dramatically changed the photography industry. As with any new technology there are people who love the changes and others who don't. In this issue of Exposed! we bring to light some perspectives on both sides of the camera! The look of film and digitalSavvy photographers are aware of the nuances of different film stock. They will use the specific film for specific purposes:
Like film, digital has a look all its own. I consider digitally captured imagery to be its own specific type of film. Its grain (or lack thereof) and colouration make it stand out from film based imagery. Digital capture allows for easy post production work (no scanning!) in the computer to obtain rich grain of Delta 3200 portrait or the punchy colour of Velvia. The downside to this digital transformation is the cost of adding the grain, subtracting the colour, or saturating the hues. The costs...Are you looking to start selling your photography but unsure about some business ideas? Consider a Harry Nowell Photo Inc. custom course - Pro Steps Process - designed to guide you, specifically, to earning income from your photography skills. It is widely suggested that entering the digital realm will save you lots of money - no film, no processing!! The cost of a film capture system, however, and digital capture system can be surprisingly similar if you factor in many elements:
Take a close look at your true costs if you have preconceived ideas! Archiving work How to file and access photos is a big subject whether you are shooting film or digital. Archiving will be a topic for a future edition of Exposed! Sign upto join the Exposed! mailing list. Digital and Film WorkflowOne big difference with digital shooting and film is the picture taking process. With film capture the photographer is involved with the subject and picture at hand only. Editing comes later. However, one shortfall with film is the lack of easy confirmation that you captured the desired shot. With digital capture you can have immediate feedback - which is an amazing benefit! However, most digital photographers create the image and edit at the same time - two jobs instead of one - this takes it's toll - lost chances because the photographer was looking at the screen instead of the world around them. There have also been cases of photographers deleting important, never to be recovered imagery. Photo District News ran an article a few years ago on this specific subject (changes in shooting styles with digital vs film). Fascinating! One example they cited involved newspaper photographers capturing Bill Clinton with a new aid. An uneventful appearance so the shooters dumped all the pictures of Bill and his new aid except one - the "dinosaur" shooting his editorial work on film. Although everyone captured the flirting, the film shooter was the only one at the end of the day with pics of Bill and the first appearance of his new aid, Monica Lewinsky. Pro PerspectiveAs a professional it is my job to create appropriate pictures for my stock clients. They don't care whether the photo was taken on a 1992 Nikon F4s or a 2006 Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II. They do care if the picture conveys what it should. The photographer's skill is far more important than the camera being used. I have seen people with cutting edge equipment take lousy photos and gifted photographers with toy cameras get amazing imagery. Sometimes image delivery is vitally important. If you are shooting the US Tennis open and Roger Federer has to be on the front page in Toronto in 6 hours you had better be shooting digitally! Sometimes file size is important. I got asked to submit slides recently for a project where the final product would be a single image blown up to 9 feet by 12 feet and viewed from 5 feet away. The client was not interested in anything digital - a transparency scanned on a drum scanner will give a better output in this unusual case. For the professional cost is very important, too. It is important to weigh the true cost and feasibility of equipment. Sometimes a new, professional digital system is required. Sometimes a used professional camera body from a local shop or e-bay will save the photographer $thousands! Homework: Digital vs Film Purchase ChecklistThe following exercise is designed to help create awareness around your needs, desires and photo costs. Answer the following questions:
Final FrameThere will always be debate on equipment. Make the best equipment decisions you can with the information you have readily available. Then get out there with your camera! It's your interpretation of the scene that is infinitely more important than the equipment you use. Take pictures. Have fun! |
Samples |